The given circular and tabular graphs delineate the data regarding the total cost and difference source of fish migrated to the US from 1988 to 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that, the rate of imported fish was increased over the period. The highest source of fish imported to the US was Canada.
It is crystal clear that, the total value of fish in 1988 was 6.57 billions dollars which was upsurged in 1992 and reached to 8.52 billions dollars.In 2000, the cost of fish accounted 10.72 billion dollars. In these given period of time the cost of fish was gone up by 2%.
Moving further, in 1998, more than a half quarter fish source was in Canada which was decreased in 1992 and 2000 and reached at 28%. whereas, China was the merely country who inclined in source of fish which imported to the US. However, the proportion of fish source was changed along the time. In 1998, it was accounted 27% which rose up in 1992 and comprised 46% and in 2000, it was declined by 2%.
- Many believe that living in a city offers greater benefits compared to life in the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of university students in three different countries
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 76
- Some people say that sports play an important role in society Others however think that it is nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and difference source of fish migrated to the US from 1988 to 2000. Overall,...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...92 and reached to 8.52 billions dollars.In 2000, the cost of fish accounted 10.72 ...
^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d 10.72 billion dollars. In these given period of time the cost of fish was gone up by 2%. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...period of time the cost of fish was gone up by 2%. Moving further, in 1998, mo...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...ed in 1992 and 2000 and reached at 28%. whereas, China was the merely country who incli...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed in 1992 and 2000 and reached at 28%. whereas, China was the merely country who incli...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...46% and in 2000, it was declined by 2%.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51396648045 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19115517763 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.644628367 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242594824511 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129078145519 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732121075719 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176751965337 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378278211916 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.