A glance at the provided circular charts illustrate the comparation of power capacity by five different types of source in gigawatts in 2015 and its projections in 2040. In general, it is clearly apparent that fossil fuels was the highest capacity of energy in 2015 and are predicted to be unchanged in 2040.
Looking in more detail from the charts, in 2015, the total energy capacity reached 6.688 gigawatts which fossil fuels contributed to 64% of the total energy followed by other renewable energy at almost quarter at 23%. Meanwhile, the other energies such as wind, nuclear, and solar energy only used from 2% to 6%. In the next two and a half decades, it is predicted that the total capacity will increase by 5.090 gigawatts. Similarly, fossil fuels will be predicted to be the highest capacity energy although its proportion will decrease at 44%. The other renewables energy also predicted as the second highest capacity of energy with unsignificant change in proportion by 2%. However, interestingly, there will be a considerable two to nine folds rise in the utilization of wind and solar energy at 12% and 18% respectively. Finally, nuclear energy will be the least energy used with unsignificant decrease by only 1% compared in 2015.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Cheating in exams is one of the biggest problems in education What do you think about reasons for this Give some solution to solve the problem 61
- The table showing percentages of water use for domestic industrial and agriculture sectors in 6 countries in 2003 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'renewables'' or 'renewable's'?
Suggestion: renewables'; renewable's
...portion will decrease at 44%. The other renewables energy also predicted as the second hig...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, second, similarly, so, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00480769231 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81219590729 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514423076923 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2955773119 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339467786114 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15828778869 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752096593089 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293241657626 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295925977463 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.