The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts (GW) in 2015 with the predictions for 2040.
The provided pie charts compares, for 2015 and 2040 projections, the amount of energy capacity available from 5 different sources. The measuring unit is gigawatts (GW).
At first glance, it is apparent that a doubling in the total capacity, from 6.688 GW to 11.678 GW, is expected in 2040, when the energy production of non-renewable sources is likely to reduce, and rely more heavily on the rest of the four types.
Looking into the details, energy from fossil fuels, in 2015, is more than half of the entire production at 64%. Most striking statistic is the difference between the more accessible renewable energy forms and those that come under the “Others” category. The former are half that of the latter, which stands at 23%.
However, this may change in 2040, as the predictions show Solar increasing to 18%, whereas it was only 2% in 2015. Similarly, wind energy’s rise may also be twofold from 5% to 12%, although Nuclear and “Others” are going to remain roughly the same at one fifth and one twentieth, respectively.
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 78
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport 78
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumers To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96571428571 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71939969366 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674285714286 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1248742453 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253979908848 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106412620398 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954219128682 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163107772241 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129814417183 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.