The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world.
The given pie charts compare the percentage of water consumed for residential, industrial and agricultural purposes in San Diego, California and the world as a whole.
It is noticeable that residential usage accounts for the vast majority of water consumption in the two American regions. By contrast, the rest of the world consumes more water in agriculture than in industry or domestic.
In San Diego County and California state, 60% and 39% of total water consumption is utilized in domestic, while only a mere of 8% of water used globally goes to homes. The opposite trend can be seen when we look at agricultural usage. This accounts for a massive 69% of water use in the rest of the world, but only 17% and 28% of the total water consumption in San Diego and California respectively.
Such dramatic differences are not seen when we compare the figures for industrial water consumption. The same proportion of water (23%) is used by San Diego and the world as a whole, while the figure for California is slightly higher, at 33%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-18 | vannhi0501 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams show how the bee makes honey and the stages in the production of honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and making comparisons where relevant 87
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84831460674 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87614662643 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2027609002 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431054657753 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189241677624 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124075791374 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277047557776 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894293562074 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.