Overall, the expenditures on housing, food and other goods and services in both charts were among the largest proportions and these of the others accounted for the least percentage
As can be seen from the charts, in 2000, the British spent mostly on other goods and services with 36% as opposed to 22% witnessed in food. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between the percentage of housing and transport with 18% and 17% respectively and clothing was left at the last place as people just allocated 7% of their spending on it
When it comes to the household expenditure in Hong Kong, the most striking feature can be seen in housing category which residents allotted over 30% to. According to the charts, there was no remarkable discrepancy witnessed in terms of food and other goods and services with 27% and 28% respectively while the total of percentage of the others, namely transport and clothing took up approximately 15%.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: TSEB
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9746835443 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79420165531 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 22.4926829268 231% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1265066274 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 262.0 112.824112599 232% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.6666666667 22.9334400587 230% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889665064345 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540675188569 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397150921288 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061879485562 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302119515121 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.3 13.2329268293 214% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 27.16 61.2550243902 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 10.3012195122 217% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.9970731707 207% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.