The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The two pie charts compare the proportion of domestic spending on five important categories in two countries namely Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, it is evident that while the Japanese spent the vast majority of their income on other commodities and services, the highest proportion of the money was used for housing in Malaysia. Moreover, the percentage of household spending on transport and health care sectors in Japan was double that of Malaysia.
It can be seen from the charts, 29% of the household’s budget in Japan paid out for other goods and services, compared to 26 percent with Malaysia. In contrast, the amount of money was allocated for the accommodations segment in Malaysia was significantly higher than that of Japan ( 34% and 24% respectively ). The opposite trend can be seen when we look at the health care aspect in both countries, this aspect accounted for only 6% and 3% in Japan and Malaysia respectively.
The year 2010 experienced a nearly similar trend in the proportion of expenses for food in two nations, Malaysia took up 27% and Japan made up 24% of the total. Turning to the remaining sector, expenditure on transport in Japan was exactly double that of the cost of living for this sector in Malaysia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies namely Japan and Malaysia in 2010. Overall, it is evident that while the Ja...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in Japan was double that of Malaysia. It can be seen from the charts, 29% of t...
^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significantly higher than that of Japan 34% and 24% respectively . The opposite ...
^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... that of Japan 34% and 24% respectively . The opposite trend can be seen when we ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% in Japan and Malaysia respectively. The year 2010 experienced a nearly simil...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f living for this sector in Malaysia.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9380952381 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80848777864 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.2966156359 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.625 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259632219522 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116935705223 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544214425438 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163735855616 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431206803555 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.