The pie charts depict the average expenditures for household services in two countries of Asia in 2010.
Overall, in 2010, the avarage percentage of household expenditure for healthcare was the lowest in both 2 countries shown.
In 2010, the rate of resident’s housing cost in Japan was paid with a normal rate, at 21% and this figure was lower than that of the remission of families’s housing in Malaysia, by 13% rate. The total money used for food in Malaysia was a bit higher than the percentage of that resident dissipation in Japan, by 3%.
As opposed to the expenditure for the other two kinds of service shown above: housing and food in Malaysia, a lot of families in Japan gave more payment to transport, healthcare and other goods, services than Malaysian's families did. The household expenditure for transport in Japan accounted for one fifth the whole percentage and had twofold of the average rate of household expenditure for that. In Malaysia. Similarity, the amount of Japan's families money used for healthcare also had a small double rate of Malaysia's household cost spent on that, while the Japanese’s residents defrayed the cost of other good services with more 3% than the residents in Malaysia did in 2010.
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development You should write at least 250 word 61
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9806763285 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80725797398 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8893108415 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.285714286 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286935648504 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166387128303 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867655985126 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208336187467 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945586052222 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.