The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year
2010.
The charts illustrate the proportion of spending on different goods and services of households in two
different countries in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that householders in both countries spent the largest proportion of their income on
Housing and Hood, while Healthcare was the service receiving the lowest share of expenditure.
The percentage of Japanese household expenditure on housing was 21%, while the figure for transport was slightly lower, at 20%. At the same time, 24% of the total family spending in Japan was on food, whereas expenditure on health care accounted for only 6% of the total money spent by Japanese families. Meanwhile, the rate of spending on Other goods and services stood at 29%, which was the highest figure.
In Malaysia, the proportion of spending on housing was highest, at 34%. Money spent on transport made up 10% of the total household expenditure, while the figure for food was significantly higher, at 27%. In the same year, 26% of spending in this country was spent on Other goods and services. By contrast, only 3% was spent on health care sector.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-30 | doremonvip123 | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-30 | doremonvip123 | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 69
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however,others think there are some other ways.Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to1990. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02747252747 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76244699354 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5894855568 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0906213478516 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424352124548 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344432308896 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0489655973182 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422814608464 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.