The two pie charts illustrate the different expenses of the average household percentagewise in the years 1950 and 2010.
Overall, housing constitutes most of the average family's expenditures at the beginning of the given time period, whereas food is more of a priority later on. In contrast, the least amount of money was spent on health care, regardless of the year.
In 1950, 72.1% of expenses are spent on housing but this figure falls drastically to just 22% in 2010. Food accounts for a mere 11.2% of total expenditure in the mid-1900s and increases significantly to 24% almost 60 years later. Similarly, other expenses contribute 4.4% to the total percentage, which sees a rise of 14.8% over the given duration.
There is a notable increase in the amount of money spent on transportation and health care between the two dates. Education, however, suffers a slight drop of 0.3% from its initial figure of 6.6% during the given periods.
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. 73
- the average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now do you agree or disagree 47
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- You have recently moved to a different house Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter Explain why you have moved Describe the new house Invite your friend to come and visit 73
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03164556962 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82225260352 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9402844488 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.375 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112305102475 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500204382937 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781155602686 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857401779132 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940378143513 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.