The presented pie charts compare Japan and Malaysia citizens in terms of how they distributed their incomes among 5 counterparts in 2010.
Overall, housing, food as well as other goods and services were three categories into which residents channeled most proportions of their budget in both nations. However, discernible differences were witnessed in the figures for each individual item.
Turning into detail, the percentages of housing and transport displayed significant gaps between two regions. Specifically, Malaysian people spent 34% of their budgets on housing, while the rate of Japanese was considerably lower, with 21%. By contrast, expenditure for transport occupied 20% of domestic income in Japan, which was two times higher than a 10-per-cent rate in Malaysia.
Regarding to remaining categories, a gap of 3% between the figures for same items in both countries can be observed. Indeed, with 29% and 6%, respectively, other goods and services, along with healthcare, accounted for higher percentages of total income in Japan than they did in Malaysia. On the contrary, a 24-per-cent proportion occupied by food in Japan was slightly lower than its percentage in Malaysia, which was 27%.
- Many people believe that modern music can have a negative impact on the young Others believe the effect of modern music is positive Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Topic 003: some people think computers and the internet are important in children’s study, but others think students can learn more effectively in schools and with teachers. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, well, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52688172043 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99467674322 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650537634409 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3538726101 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891860579037 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377641037064 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517676216897 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658530914757 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583575816279 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.