The pie charts illustrate the proportion of 5 different kinds of energy production ( Coal, gas, nuclear, petro and others ) in France between 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that coal and gas were the major sources in France and both figures experienced an upward trend. Nuclear energy and other kinds of energy also increased significantly from 1995 to 2005 while there is a considerable decrease in petrol data.
From 1995 to 2005, coal was by far the most prevalent energy source in France, accounting for 29,8% and then increase slightly to 30,93% in 2005. Similarly, the proportion of gas also experienced a slight increase from 29,63% to 30,31% of the total.
With regard to the remaining energy production, only 4,9% of total energy output went into the “other” category and 5,4% went into the nuclear category. However, from 1995 to 201, the production of nuclear and other energy both experienced a significant increase to 10,1% and 9,1% respectively. By contrast, there was a remarkable decline in petro from accounting for 29,27% to making up 19,55% of total energy production.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f 5 different kinds of energy production Coal, gas, nuclear, petro and others in...
^^
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on Coal, gas, nuclear, petro and others in France between 1995 and 2005. Overal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09944751381 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75485148033 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.9263108798 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172601321451 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877564631888 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972203068334 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13951123171 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114674025888 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f 5 different kinds of energy production Coal, gas, nuclear, petro and others in...
^^
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on Coal, gas, nuclear, petro and others in France between 1995 and 2005. Overal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09944751381 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75485148033 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.9263108798 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.375 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172601321451 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877564631888 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972203068334 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13951123171 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114674025888 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.