The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The two pie charts illustrates the proportion of five types of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, in both years, the most significant sources of energy were gas and coal, which together accounted for over half the production of energy, while nuclear and other kinds of energy sources generated the least amount of energy in France. In all types of energy production there was only minimal change over the 10 year period.
Energy produced by coal comprised of 29.80% in the first year and this showed only a very slight increase of about a mere 1% to 30.9% in 2005. Likewise, in 1995, gas was generated 29.63% which rose marginally to 30.1% 10 years later.
With regards to the remaining methods of production energy, there was an approximate 5% growth in production from both nuclear power and other sources to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively. Petrol, on the other hand, was only source of energy which decreased in production from 29.27% in 1995 to around a fifth(19.55%) in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 86
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The should below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... the most significant sources of energy were gas and coal, which together accounted ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87134502924 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54863435752 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5272862131 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229949018484 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115069993411 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101828116929 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163399494174 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111304451435 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.