The pie charts illustrate information about the comparison of various kinds of energy consumption of France in one decade. The data are shown in percentage. Overall, the highest energy production in 1995 was gas, while coal was the biggest after one decade. There was a gradual increase can be seen in the production of Nuclear, Gas, Coal, and other energy throughout the period, whereas Petro continued to decrease
Looking at the fourth energy consumption, there was a highest increase of energy production which was Nuclear, approximately 6% in 1995 to above 10% in 2015. Moreover, for Gas and Coal rose gradually about 0.5% and 1% for their emitted respectively. Furthermore, other source of energy consumption were grew steadily from 4.90% to 9.10% by the end of the period.
Regarding the remaining energy consumption, petro was emitted by people over 29% in 1995. Towards the end of the period, there was a sharp decline on Petro to approximately 19% by the end of the period.
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 84
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...he fourth energy consumption, there was a highest increase of energy production w...
^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...other source of energy consumption were grew steadily from 4.90% to 9.10% by the end...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0487804878 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84345162306 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3189592308 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167384602573 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745604680748 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997260832606 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112047323367 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811683158478 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.