The two pie charts illustrate the difference in percentage of the production of energy in France from 1995 to 2005. Overall, Gas was the most produced energy at the beginning of the period whereas Coal took the place of Gas in 2005.On the other hand, energies other than Gas, Petro, Coal and Nuclear comprise the lowest share in energy production over the period.
Gas contributed to nearly 30% of the energies produced in 1995 which increased to more than 30% in 2005. But Coal became the most produced energy surpassing the production of Gas by a little margin in 2005. On the other hand, production of petro has been reduced by almost 10% over the period of ten years. Nuclear energies have also been produced at approximately 4% higher rate than ten years ago. Other energies continue to have the lowest share among all although there has also been a significant increase of nearly 5% in their production.
In conclusion, there has been a moderate change in the production of various types of energies in France over the period of ten years. Production of all types of energies have an increase except Petro which fall dramatically by 10%. However, Coal has become the most produced energy in 2005 coming from second position in 1995.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...reas Coal took the place of Gas in 2005.On the other hand, energies other than Gas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81775700935 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52712164042 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46261682243 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6095281302 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216277437341 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107776034123 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106875715342 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167051192691 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583619809593 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.