The given pie charts provide the information about the change of different 5 categories of the rate of sources .the course of ten years, namely coal, gas, petro, nuclear and other sources of energy, starting in 1995.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that an upward trend was experienced in coal, gas, nuclear and other sources of energy except petro, going into a free-fall. Additionally, coal remained the most popular of production over the surveyed years.
Specifically, coal accounted for 29.80 percent in 1995. Then, this figure was increased until reaching a peak of 30.93 percent in 2005, ensued by gas, which was accelerated from 29.63 percent to a level of 30.31 percent in 2005. Not only coal and gas can be seen, but other sources of energy and nuclear was also registered the same trend to approximately 9.10 percent and 10.10 percent, respectively.
Strikingly, petro, occupied 29.27 percent in 1995, was gone into a free-fall. From then on, petro was declined considerably. As a result, only 19.55 percent of the total energy consumed belonged to petro in 2005.
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rent 5 categories of the rate of sources .the course of ten years, namely coal, ga...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r sources of energy, starting in 1995. Overall, it is immediately obvious that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f production over the surveyed years. Specifically, coal accounted for 29.80 p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcent and 10.10 percent, respectively. Strikingly, petro, occupied 29.27 percen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10674157303 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72899583277 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.8640381721 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0476706161222 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219036621403 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266032679594 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378656298128 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029858242986 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.