The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant v

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
v

The charts illustrate the different 5 categories of sources of energy produced by France in the course of two years, namely coal, gas, petro, nuclear and other energy, starting in 1995 and the second year is 2005.

Overall, it is immediately obvious that gas and coal are the major kinds of energy consumed in France, and other sources of energy generated the minimum amount of energy in France. It can be seen that an upward trend was experienced in gas, coal, nuclear and other sources of energy with the exception of petro. In addition, it is clear that coal occupied the first positions and other kinds of energy reach the lowest record.

To begin with, the major source of energy: coal, standing at 29.80 percent. Then, this figure moved upward to 30.93 percent. Not only coal can be seen, but a similar trend also witnessed in other energy (9.10 percent), nuclear (10.10 percent), and gas (30.31 percent), which reached an upturn, too. Petro stood at 29.27 percent and then reached a downward to 19.55 percent.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-10 khangoccho 11 view
2021-11-13 khangoccho 78 view
Essays by user khangoccho :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 1995 and the second year is 2005. Overall, it is immediately obvious that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...al, nuclear and other sources of energy with the exception of petro. In addition, it is clear that co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of energy reach the lowest record. To begin with, the major source of energ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82285714286 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25438529565 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4390427451 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0887593490253 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432840034754 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504420772379 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081421877299 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565689016618 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.