The two pie charts illustrate six different types of devices used by young adults aged 18 to 25 in two years 2007 and 20017.
Overall, it is noticeable that the figure for adults using mobile phones, tablets, and Flat-screen TV increased tremendously over the 10-year period. By contrast, fewer young people chose Conventional TV to watch television.
On the one hand, although conventional TV was the most popular choice for young people to watch television in 2007, its figure dropped enormously from 34% to 4% in 2017. The percentages of young adolescents using laptops and desktop computers experienced a similar trend, falling from 20% to 12% and from 18% to 12% between 2007 and 2017, respectively.
On the other hand, despite having the least proportion with only 5% in 2007, tablet rose and become the third common choice for people aged 18-25 group to watch a lot of things, standing at 19% in 2017. Likewise, the proportion of people using mobile phones increased sharply by 11% between 2007 and 2017. Over the same period, there was a considerable growth in the percentage of young adults using flat-screen TV for watching purposes from 8% in 2007 to 34% in 2017.
- The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011
- the diagram below shows the production of olive oil 61
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011
To whom it may concern: I…
To whom it may concern:
I made mistakes about some statistics in detail, but the trends are still correct.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91959798995 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70265813617 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572864321608 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0437261004 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193539137535 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970015758971 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088375631938 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147495165768 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102490764024 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.