The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The pie chart depicts that production of energy from deff sources in two countries NZ and Germany between 1980 and 2010.
It is clear that, overall generation of electricity in Germany in 2010 was exactly double than in 1980. Whereas,NZ largely depends on coal while, the figure was almost tripple in 2010 that was highest over the period.
In terms of New Zealand in 1980, Only 56 units energy was produced from coal. Since, the number of energy generation was almost trippled at 150 in 2010.Afterwards, After experiencing an increase to 46 units, hydro was used for generation of energy, accounted for about 30. Then, According to natural gas and petroleum, figure of electricity Creation stood at 30 and 11 respectively in 1980 whereas, it declined drastically to 2 units for both sources in 2010.
Regarding Germany, there was drastic decrease in use of natural gas from 28 in 1980 to 2 in 2010. But, Nuclear was used for the generating electricity represented at 20, before witnessing a rise to 155 throughout the period. For Hydro, it was used for generating only 7 units electricity. During the same period from 1980 to 2010, there was same number of units of electricity which was produced from petroleum at 28.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Trang Carina | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | noor salah | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Sơn Joyous | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them and replace them with new ones Why is this happening What problems may it lead to 42
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , NZ
...was exactly double than in 1980. Whereas,NZ largely depends on coal while, the figu...
^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... figure was almost tripple in 2010 that was highest over the period. In terms of New Zea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...56 units energy was produced from coal. Since, the number of energy generation was al...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterwards
...tion was almost trippled at 150 in 2010.Afterwards, After experiencing an increase to 46 u...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90865384615 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79970792406 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8648968392 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272486934634 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127906195066 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822985634445 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197123925274 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598846542802 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.