The data source provides information on the ratio of homes, which were owned and leased in the UK during two different time periods, in 1991 and 2007.
Overall, it is evident that the percentage of houses has slightly increased by six million from 1991 to 2007. Moreover, both in 1991 and 2007 ownership of houses is the dominant force, followed by social renting, private renting, and social housing respectively.
Looking at the pie charts in more detail it becomes clear that the percentage of houses owned by people in England has demonstrated a strong upward trend. In particular, in 2007 almost 70 percent of 27 million homes in England is owned and not rented.
In contrast, the percentage of social renting has dropped from 1991 dramatically to nearly 15 percent in 2007. Similarly, the number of houses owned by social institutions has decreased significantly to 5 percent approximately by the end of the same year.
Finally, the number of homes rented by individuals has remained relatively unchanged, close to 18 percent during both years.
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 89
- The diagram shows how the glass is recycled
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- People in major cities suffer from high levels of air pollution that causes health problems for many Explain possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions 78
- The diagram below shows how Olive Oil is manufactured Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1091954023 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83547749416 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4734574533 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241932226904 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101706088167 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503969106192 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118962335161 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512386378115 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.