The pie charts below show the proportion of the whole school expenditure in five differences sources over the periods between 1981 and 2001.
The pie charts below show the proportion of the total school expenditure in five differences sources over the periods between 1981 and 2001.
Overall, it is clear that most of the money spent on teachers’ salaries. Otherwise, the percentage of other workers’ salaries reduced gradually over 20 years.
There was a slight increase in rates of insurance from 2% in 1981, 3% in 1991 to 8% in 2001. The spending on furniture and equipment dropped quickly from 15% in 1981 to 5 % in 1991 before reached the point of 23% in 2001. There was a small rise in the proportion of resources and books from 15% in 1981 to 20 % in 1991 before dramatic fall to 9% in 2001.
The expenditure on teachers’ salaries climbed slightly from 40% in 1981 to reach a peak of 50% in 1991. In contrast, the spending on other workers’salaries reduced gradually from 28% in 1981 to 22% in 1991. In the next ten years, there was a continuous decrease, in the wages of teachers and other workers, from 50% and 22% in 1991 to 45% and 15% in 2001, respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 56
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 87
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 73
- Many university students live with their families, while others live awayfrom home because their universities are in different places. What are theadvantages and disadvantages of both situations? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67204301075 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03205953369 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8261041259 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291406405084 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148770609963 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.261759383425 0.0843802449381 310% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274601164423 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.353186310473 0.0819641961636 431% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.