The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children’s activities. The
first chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in,
whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate.
The graphs give the information about how many children (boys and girls) participate in the types of cultural and leisure activities.
Overall, it is important to note that computer games are the overall activities participated by most boys and that dancing has most girls participant almost in all children's activities surveyed.
Turning to detail, there are more boys involved in computer games and basketball activities, accounting for 34% and 26% respectively, with that computer games having the highest figure shown on the chart. Then, it is continued by other activities such as soccer, skateboarding, and listening to music which is all in 10's. And, only 2% of boys are interested in reading.
Regarding girl's activities, that the dancing and reading are the most popular activities which most girls participate in. Moreover, we can see that computer games and netball have a similar pattern at 16% and 15%. Likewise, the gymnastics figure as much as listening to music at 11%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-12 | farshid.manami@yahoo.com | 56 | view |
2018-11-14 | phreshyaw | 84 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. 56
- The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children’s activities. Thefirst chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in,whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate. 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and waterconsumption in two different countries. 67
- Do you agree that money is the only motivation at work why people prefer working in the same company for many years? 67
- The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countriesbetween 1990 and 1999. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, regarding, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89481763619 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7444139497 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235963931235 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929171745913 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743874919109 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147872808246 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286386917638 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.