The graph below depicts information about British Emigration to selected
destinations between 2004 and 2007.
The number of people emigrates from Britain to five different countries from 2004 to 2007 is depicted by the graph.
The general trend was for emigration to decrease during the period shown, except Australia and Spain was the most dominant over a five-year period.
Moving to more detailed analysis, in 2004, the majority of people in Britain move to Australia and Spain, with 41 and 35 thousand people respectively. Where Australia's having the highest figure shown. Meanwhile, Other countries such as US, New Zealand, and France were migrated by fewer people from Britain in 2004, recording at only 24 thousand people each.
Four years later, the figure for Australia witnessed a slighter increase, inclining from 41 to 45. It showed the highest figure for emigrates in 2007. There was a downward trend of people migration, however, in Spain, New Zealand, USA, and France, which all were in 20's, except France. People in Britain had a much smaller number of emigration.
- These days children tend to spend a great deal of time playing computer games Some believe this is a beneficial trend while others think it is detrimental 85
- Some people believe that a person’s intelligence is inherited from the parents,while others believe that their environment is the main factor. Discuss theseviews. Which factor do you think is mostly responsible for intelligence. 61
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001. 84
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. 56
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...41 and 35 thousand people respectively. Where Australias having the highest figure sh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55147016443 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7960952751 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108294709076 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541505250356 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797762146326 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904284904339 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892382591403 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.