The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australian and France in 1980 and 2000

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australian and France in 1980 and 2000.

The pie charts compare the number of five different groups of electricity by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
It is obvious that the coal fuel was much more than others in Australia between 1980 and 2000, while the number of nuclear power was most of others in Farce in 2000.
As can be seen, Although the nuclear power there was not among of groups of fuel the coal group by 50 units was more than other three groups such as oil, natural gas, and hydro power by ordered 10, 20, and 20 units and the total production equal to 100 units in Australia in 1980, However oil and natural fuels by 2 units had the minimum of percentage and coal fuel by 130 units amount of 170 units as total product had maximum in Australia in 2000.
while in France the maximum percent related to coal and natural groups by 25 units and other groups like hydro power was lowest percent in 1980. The nuclear power had maximum percentage among of five groups of electricity fuel by 126 units and hydro power and natural gas by 2 units were minimum in 2000.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-11 Ahmad_off 67 view
2021-11-07 ngango56 73 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the others') or simply say ''most others''.
Suggestion: most of the others; most others
..., while the number of nuclear power was most of others in Farce in 2000. As can be seen, Alt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...duct had maximum in Australia in 2000. while in France the maximum percent related t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...units and other groups like hydro power was lowest percent in 1980. The nuclear power had ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as to, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3807106599 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.06519771791 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431472081218 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.41694233 43.030603864 280% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.6 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.4 22.9334400587 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302786113444 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203638017245 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116894717042 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230314748745 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11621371356 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.72 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.