The pie charts shows units of electricity by fuel sources such as coal,oil,natural gas,hydro power and nuclear in two countries Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that coal has been used the most in Australia over 50 units in the past to 2000. In France they were used natural gas in the same amount from 1980 and 2000.
In 2000, Australia has used coal to make electricity up to 130 units and hydro power has been increased more 16 units. To compare with France they were used many amount of nuclear power up to 126 units but, in Australia they didn’t used any of these fuel source.
On the other hand, France has used all the fuel sources, in 1980 the most of fuel they used were natural gas and coal in the same amount which is 25 units. However France has increased 5 units of oil in 2000.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 22
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes(in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 56
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , oil
...electricity by fuel sources such as coal,oil,natural gas,hydro power and nuclear in...
^^^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , hydro
...uel sources such as coal,oil,natural gas,hydro power and nuclear in two countries Aus...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...,oil,natural gas,hydro power and nuclear in two countries Australia and France in...
^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'many amounts'.
Suggestion: many amounts
.... To compare with France they were used many amount of nuclear power up to 126 units but, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l in the same amount which is 25 units. However France has increased 5 units of oil in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 680.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41558441558 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28836917834 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474025974026 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9101030634 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1428571429 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253534953748 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147274634273 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812580329076 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193288264591 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828834642166 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.27 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 15.0 40.7170731707 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.