The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The information about units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000

Overall, the most units of electricity were produced by fuel source in Australia in Coal at 50 and 130 in around two decades. Besides, in France, Coal and Natural Gas picked in 1980 and replaced by Nuclear Power at 126 units in 2000.

Initially, Coal was the most popular units than other fuel source at 130 units in Australian, while stood at the second fuel source in France in 2000. Then, the Nuclear Power stood at 126 unit just under Coal in 2000. Besides, Oil and Natural Gas was the weakest units produced by fuel source in Australia. In contrast, Natural Gas, Oil and Coal experienced almost same around a quarter.

In 2000, the highest increase experienced in Nuclear Power with difference at 111 units. Following Oil increased at 25 unit. On the other hand, Coal increased at 130, following Hydro Power at 36 units. There were a decline in Natural Gas and Oil in Australia.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-16 tata view
2021-10-30 NadhifMuhammadMumtaz 67 view
2021-10-30 tegarangkasa 73 view
2020-12-20 vicky sharma 67 view
2020-12-20 vicky sharma 90 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne in Natural Gas and Oil in Australia.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79310344828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5079869774 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8311043113 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215995334132 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977460358982 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104203160436 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216292834954 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162949959162 0.0819641961636 199% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne in Natural Gas and Oil in Australia.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79310344828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5079869774 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8311043113 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215995334132 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977460358982 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104203160436 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216292834954 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162949959162 0.0819641961636 199% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.