The pie charts illustrate different types of ways to get access of news in Canada and Australia. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
At the first glance it can be noticed that in terms of watching news online citizens of Australia numbers accounted for 52%. However, Canadian prefer watching online news accounted for 36%. Furthermore Australian people are less addicted to tv as compared to Canadian people. Moving towards, some citizens of Canada still prefer print Newspaper the initial percentage is 14%. However, Australians are less in terms of reading Newspaper the number comprise of 7%. Analyzing further more it can be clearly seen that Australians are least in terms of listening news on Radio the number accounted for 2%. Probing further Canadians are ahead in getting news from radio the number comprised to 7%.
To cap it all, it is vividly seen that in both the countries technology are taking over print newspapers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...watching online news accounted for 36%. Furthermore Australian people are less addicted to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...n terms of reading Newspaper the number comprise of 7%. Analyzing further more it can be cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ll, it is vividly seen that in both the countries technology are taking over print newspa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10967741935 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66939333371 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5908186661 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.2 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139683006806 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590284087517 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953044151325 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11536942905 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115674044623 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.