The pie charts demonstrate the proportion of time spent by adolescents and senior citizens on the world wide web.
The pie charts demonstrate the proportion of time spent by adolescents and senior citizens on the world wide web.
Overall, as can be seen, there is a tangible difference between 18-26 age group with 60-70 age group in terms of allocating their spare time via the internet. While the younger generation tends to devote more time on social networking and far less on cinema and travel the elderly people spend most of their free time on cinema and travel and far lower on social networking.
Looking at the youth graph, social networking with 24% and music and films with 21% ranked first and second regarding the free time spent on the internet activities, followed by researching with 20% and playing games with 18%. Making bookings and purchases accounted for a meager percentage of the total with 5% and 12% respectively.
Regarding the senescent people illustration, it is crystal clear that the trend is largely reversed. Playing games and social networking make up an insignificant amount, lower than 10%; however, researching and booking accounted for more than half of the time of older people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 89 | view |
- It is true to say that in the new millennium most of the nations struggling with environmental issues. 78
- The pie charts demonstrate the proportion of time spent by adolescents and senior citizens on the world wide web. 89
- It is true to say that in the new millennium and due to the consumerism culture, some citizens borrow money in order to purchase various products and facilities which do not use and cost an arm and a leg sometimes. 78
- The diagram demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to design a trade show over the course of two years. 56
- The table compares social and economic factors based on the United Nation (UN) statistics in four nations, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06557377049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67550939134 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612021857923 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1528179606 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243614617338 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165505768335 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.341205641488 0.0843802449381 404% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280306021735 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.41565055305 0.0819641961636 507% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.