The pie charts show information about energy production in a country in two separate years.
The given bar chart delineates information about different forms of energy produced in a particular country in two years, 1995 and 2005.
Overall, by 2005, all forms of energy had been produced in increased percentages, at the expense of petroleum which dropped considerably in production. Additionally, coal had, by far, accounted for the highest proportion of energy produced in the country provided, followed closely by gas and petroleum, and, at a distance, by nuclear and other forms of energy.
The types of energy used in the given country were primarily in favour of coal and gas, accounting for 29.80% and 29.63% in 1995 and 30.93% and 30.31% in 2005, respectively, showing a slight increase in both categories. Petroleum followed at nearly 30% (29.27%) in 1995 and dropped to less than 20% (19.55%) 10 years later, maintaining the third position in both years mentioned.
Nuclear energy, on the other hand, saw a significant rise in its share, nearly doubling from 6.40% to over 10%. A similar pattern can be seen in other forms of energy, with figures rising from nearly 5% to over 9% in 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75996633511 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589189189189 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2578424354 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16942721859 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796531786758 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940671591567 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11724930902 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110157599132 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.