The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the causes for which the people migrated themselves from or to the UK in 2007.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that most people immigrate and emigrate for the reason of definite jobs, while fewer people chose to go to other countries for no reason stated. On the other hand, less emigration has taken place due to formal studies.
To begin with immigration, firstly, for having a definite job 30% among total migration people came to the UK and during this period 6% people migrated to the same place for no reason stated. Secondly, over one-fourth, arrived here for doing the study and half of that percentage came over from other places for searching jobs. Moreover, 15% and 6% came from other nations for accompanying and other reasons respectively.
Turning to emigration, it was similar to the first section when 26% of people which was the highest percentage in terms of emigration. Then comes the looking for jobs which were 10% higher than immigration. In the case of, no reason stated, the percentage of emigrated people was three times bigger than immigrated. In terms of accompanying and others the difference, not more than 2-3%. But a significant difference was in the formal study, only 4% went to other countries for studying.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9400921659 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62574967629 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7508048899 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4545454545 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166032086134 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717655425317 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795725327058 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13962814804 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917894521997 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.