the plan below show the layout of a university's sport centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.
The maps describe the changes in layout to the sport center of a university with the introduction of redevelopment.
Looking at the pictures it can be seen that the sport center will undogo remarkable changes after reconstructed. The most noticeable changes that the area will witness are the unity all separate building into a unique block and the addition of many service area.
As can be seen from the pictures, two outdoor courts in the left and right of main area will be demolished and replaced by other amenity. To the West of the map, a new leisure pool will be set up in the current position of the west outdoor courts. The leisure pool are going to be connected to the other parts of the sport center via a change room and a sport shop in the right. On the other side of the center, a new hall will be opened to lead to the zone for gym which are going to be widen to the East. There are two dance studios built in the right of the entrance to gym. While the current East outdoor courts will be transformed into a sport hall, a novel changing room is planned opposite, next to a cafe.
According to the plans, it is clear that the reception and 25m pool will remain unchanged after redevelopment. In addition, the seating in the right and changing room in the left of being mentioned pool will also look same as in the present.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38554216867 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44577324073 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4859437751 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0284921017 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2727272727 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168210938786 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074706496948 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524754168337 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122570703208 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235896253441 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.