The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The two plans provided, depict the layout of a museum in which alternations occurred during twenty years. the first in 1990 and the second in 2010.

Overall, though the general design of the ground floor stayed the same, few changes were noticeable. The most striking alternation has been to the Areaology gallery which was completely demolished and then sectioned into two individual areas ( children's interactive zone and poster display area) in 2010.

In case of new places establishment in the area, initially, a lift was placed right between the cafe and gift shop and natural history room in 2010 which there was no evidence of it in 1990. Moreover, on the right side of the scheme, there are two new regions, the children's interactive zone and the poster display area that previously, the Archaeology gallery was located there. In addition to that, there is a new café in northeast of the plan, however, this place has been emerged with the gift shop.

according to the data provided, there were some minor changes in terms of location in few items, For instance, in 1990, when you came through the entrance, It was a reception counter pushed back right in front of the museum office, nevertheless, the counter got closer to the entrance in an oblique position. also, the statue moved to the central part of the hall in 2010 due to the extension of the gift shop where the statue was located initially in 1990. It is also notable that the rest of the main plan remained the same.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ernations occurred during twenty years. the first in 1990 and the second in 2010. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst in 1990 and the second in 2010. Overall, though the general design of th...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...then sectioned into two individual areas childrens interactive zone and poster di...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one and poster display area in 2010. In case of new places establishment in t...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has been emerged with the gift shop. according to the data provided, there we...
^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...s been emerged with the gift shop. according to the data provided, there were some m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...to the entrance in an oblique position. also, the statue moved to the central part o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, for instance, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80620155039 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51284782318 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562015503876 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.719807379 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138750213379 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646980148782 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412501901336 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094556000213 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495288937434 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ernations occurred during twenty years. the first in 1990 and the second in 2010. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irst in 1990 and the second in 2010. Overall, though the general design of th...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...then sectioned into two individual areas childrens interactive zone and poster di...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one and poster display area in 2010. In case of new places establishment in t...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has been emerged with the gift shop. according to the data provided, there we...
^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...s been emerged with the gift shop. according to the data provided, there were some m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...to the entrance in an oblique position. also, the statue moved to the central part o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, for instance, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80620155039 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51284782318 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562015503876 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.719807379 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138750213379 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646980148782 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412501901336 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094556000213 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495288937434 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.