The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.
The two maps compare the structure of a university’s sport centre at the present and its planned changes after reconstruction.
Overall, the sport center is planned to be expanded significantly towards the east and west. More amenities are going to be provided, diversifying the recreational activities of users.
Now, after entering the sport centre through a main entrance in the south, there is a reception right opposite the entrance. In the heart of this centre, there is a 25m-long pool with a seating area in the east, a changing room in the west and a gym right behind it. A range of outdoor courts lie in both side of the main building.
The future plan mostly shows no change in the existing facilities, apart from the widening of the gym towards the east and the destruction of outdoor courts. On the right of the entrance, the plan after redevelopment shows the emergence of a cafe and a changing room. In the same direction, a sport hall will be added, together with two dance studios in the further east. On the opposite direction, a sports shop is going to be erected, with another nearby changing room. A striking feature in the second layout is the construction of a leisure poor which is much larger than the old indoor one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 84 | view |
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 89
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 89
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75229357798 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7793623028 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.846637034 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245339432045 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087372610185 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817553388055 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143340244328 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656561607907 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.