The two diagrams compare the plan in the sports centre of university after reconstruction.
It can be clearly seen that outdoor courts will be dismantled and the sports centre will expand more westerly and easterly. Overall, the present facilities will not change except the gym room will see a growing.
Look precisely to the current map, there is a reception behind the entrance as well as a changing room on the left-hand door and the user is available to get in the 25 meters swimming pool via the door inside the changing room. Also, seating post on the right-hand door as well as Gym room places on the north of the building. As far as outdoor courts, which set on both sides of the centre.
In future, there is an easterly development that a big sport hall will be set behind the seating. In addition, sports shop and cafe would open after entering the entrance and turn left or right. The amount of changing room would be triple, in addition to the original, the others will plan on the corner independently. Moreover, leisure pool will establish in the future. Lastly, on the east, there will be two dance studios.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...which set on both sides of the centre. In future, there is an easterly development that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...east, there will be two dance studios.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, lastly, look, moreover, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70351758794 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52049000732 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0088026073 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143422319667 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611058830205 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563620417503 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112054313891 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708251278916 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.