The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps compare Grange Park in two different periods: when it was first available to the public in 1920 and in present day.
Ỏverall, the park has had several significant changes over the years, namely the rose garden, the stage, play area and water feature.
To begin with, the fountain which was once located at the centre of the park in 1920 has been replaced by a rose garden. In addition, the seats which used to be scattered around the park have now been placed surrounding the central rose garden. There used to be a stage for musicians on the left side of the fountain, but that place has now become amphitheatre for concerts.
Furthermore, the place which was glasshouse situated on the right side of the entrance in 1920 has turned into a water feature at present. Across the water feature is the play area for children, which used to be a pond for water plants back in the days. Finally, a cafe has recently appeared next to the play area, in the place that was once a rose garden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The diagram below shows the process from Australian Bureau of Meteorology of collecting up-to-minute information for the purpose of producting reliable weather forecasts.Describe the process in detail. 84
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment.What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it? 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion ? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57692307692 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34100111006 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 10.9423203664 43.030603864 25% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.125 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994766080873 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494568233801 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552399894251 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769810708835 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058541261876 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.