The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided maps illustrate the primary layout of a public park in 1920 and it's current blueprint to describe the changes.
Overall, the current layout demonstrates major infrastructural changes, in addition to the establishment of new features.
Firstly, the most conspicuous of all is that the fountain at the center is replaced by a large rose garden which is surrounded by four seating areas from each direction. Previously, if you walked left along the Eldon street, you would see a rose garden and some seats. However, not only these but also the previous stage have been removed. These infrastructures have been substituted with a large amphitheatre for concerts.
It is also worth pointing out that the pond for water plants as well as the rose garden beside it are turned into a children's playground and a cafe respectively. Although both entrances remain the same, an entrance with underground car park is also built. Moreover, a new artificial waterfall is constructed by removing the glass house. The rose garden on the left to Arnold Avenue kept unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should write at least 250 words 78
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 67
- Nowadays more people prefer to communicate via text message and email instead of face to face Why do you think this is the best way When is face to face communication necessary 89
- The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 89
- he charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96875951499 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.153378216 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585121712478 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0217518862251 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445367024078 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437589960946 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531106703725 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.