The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Two schemes provide information about the Grange park in 1920 and its alterations over time. Overall, the park changed its logistic and started to offer people more possibilities than they used to have decades ago such as a cafe and a parking.
The most significant alterations are a transformation of the stage for musicians into the amphitheatre for concepts and a displacement of seats, which in 1920 were around the stage, in the centre of the park. What is more, the pond for water was removed in the right bottom part of the scheme and turned into the water feature. The children's play area was introduced in right top of the park, and near this zone the cafe was constructed. The quantity of rose gardens was reduced to two. Besides, an underground car park was built in the lower right corner of the park.
As for things which were not changed during the time, it is worth to mentioned two entrances which are situated in top and bottom sides of the park near the central rose garden.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Dhruvik goswami | 59 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | doubletee | 93 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | kidosince2000 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | phuongtran19 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | elhamjavadi | 78 | view |
- The following advice was given to a politician by his political consultant: "It is true that 200 apartment renters protested in the rain about the elimination of rent control regulation. However, there are 20,000 renters in the entire city. 19,800 of them 10
- A recent study reveals that people, especially young people, are reading far less literature—novels, plays, and poems—than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and fo 65
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people choose friends who are different from themselves. Others choose friends who are similar to themselves. Compare the advantages of having friends who are different from you with the advantages of having friends who are similar to you. Which kind 70
- The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine: “Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Salu 51
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, as for, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65536723164 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57598620686 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570621468927 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2961395547 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114404323329 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546156647673 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043056228526 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771645199598 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026794764062 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.