The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented maps illustrate how Grange Park, which is located between Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street, has been changed since the 1920 year, when it was opened for visitors.
Overall, although the present park has a lot of new objects to compare with previous years, some places are saved after years.
Firstly, it can be observed what places have been retained. Obviously, two entrances are located on the same spots, where they were at the moment of opening. Besides, Roses garden, which is situated on the left of entrance to Arnold Avenue, continues to be there.
Regarding changes, it is clear that the Amphitheater for concerts had replaced stage for musicians by present time. New rose garden appeared in the center of the park instead of Fountain, which was located there in 1920. On the right from the north entrance, the rose garden and the pond were changed by the cafe and play zone for children. The water feature, further, was constructed on the site of Glasshouse, which had been located near Eldon street gate. New noticeable change is the underground car park, whose entrance is near the water feature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices 61
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 85
- The numbers of refugees and immigrants is increasing. What are the possible causes and effects of this? Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca Cola Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... places are saved after years. Firstly, it can be observed what places have been...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92631578947 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.387966137 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636842105263 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4825399117 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102359908912 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402145131131 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441849558138 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663088670889 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330064079952 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.