The plans show the changes at Grange Park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park recently. Overall, when comparing the two structures it is clear clearly to see be seen that there had been various modifications.
First of all, starting from the left, the stage for musicians had been replaced by the amphitheater for concerts. In the 1920’s version of the park, there were three rose gardens in total. In today's park, only one of them remains at its initial position. The rose garden which was near the pond is now changed into a cafe shop. Furthermore, the notable fountain is reconstructed into another rose garden which is surrounded by four seats. The number of seats is fewer by one in comparison with 1920’s number.
Secondly, moving to the right part, the glasshouse was is renovated into a water feature with the addition of the entrance of an underground car park nearby. Another point worth mentioning is the pond for water plants at the higher right corner was is revamped to a children’s play area. Both the entrances in Arnold avenue and Eldon street remain the same.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat there had been various modifications First of all starting from the left the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r by one in comparison with 1920s number Secondly moving to the right part the gl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... avenue and Eldon street remain the same
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65789473684 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42941918209 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 190.0 22.4926829268 845% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 885.0 112.824112599 784% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 190.0 22.9334400587 828% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 58.0 5.23603664747 1108% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196599205584 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196599205584 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140772354518 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960091098502 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 95.5 13.2329268293 722% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -104.45 61.2550243902 -171% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 75.0 10.3012195122 728% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.93 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.72 8.06136585366 207% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 78.0 10.9970731707 709% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.