The two pictures differentiate the layout of a public park, while one represents when it started and the other shows the condition of the present day.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that most of the features are changed, whereas some of those are in their right position.
To begin with, the entrances are in the same place. In 1920, at the center, there was a fountain that was replaced by a square rose garden and around the rose garden, there are seats, so that people can take rest. Then at the right bottom of the picture, there was a glasshouse and seats, but at the present time both are removed and a water feature and underground car parking slot are built. In addition, at the top right corner replacing the rose garden and pond, a playground for children and a cafe is constructed.
On the other side, in 1920, both sides had rose gardens and seats but today the seats and bottom side rose garden do not exist. In the past, there was a stage for the musicians which was replaced by an amphitheater. Now it is being used for concerts.
- Some peopel think that one world government is better than national governments Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both these views and state your opinion 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 14
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 89
- Some people say that excessive noise should be a criminal offense while others say they should be free to make noise without limitation Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51030927835 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36791017953 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4250358171 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101455784413 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397885174742 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450843677334 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663835118719 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492397723937 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.