The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The diagrams illustrate the layout of a student accommodation block in 2010 and the present.
Overall, there are more study bedrooms now compared with 2010, and provision for parking is now available.
In 2010, there were only three study bedrooms. In the present plan, one study bedroom has replaced the living room in the 2010 diagram, and another study bedroom has been built next to it. This is shown on the top left corner of the plan. In addition, an en-suite bathroom has now been added to the study bedroom to the right of the hall, reducing the size of the hall.
There were two garden areas in 2010, but one of these is now a parking area at the side of the hall. One garden remains, however, at the other side of the block. Although there is no longer a living room, in the present plan the kitchen is larger than in 2010 and now includes a social area for students. There are no changes to the entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-14 | Ngoc Trinh | 11 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012 69
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47337278107 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23029047018 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1969894102 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143044141421 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598583777018 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435000046616 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102526262789 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272378366075 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.