Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on more important subjects.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that people hold conflicting views about studying the science of food and its preparation. While some believe that this is a waste of time, which should be spent on more important studies, I agree with those who argue that food science and preparation should form an integral part of the student curriculum.
On the one hand, there are already many subjects and activities that must be part of the timetable of all secondary schools. It is impossible to compare them in terms of their significance in the development of young people. For example, it is essential to have a good grasp of mathematics, IT, and the natural sciences, together with reading and writing skills, and activities such as art, music and sport. Sometimes, there are also vocational courses, and therefore school timetables are already full.
On the other hand, food and diet are fundamental to health, and I support the view that food science and preparation must be taught in schools. Firstly, knowledge of food science is related to the study of human biology, in terms of building up the immune system, and the effects on the body of eating a balanced diet rather than consuming junk food. Secondly, it is also related to biochemistry. Students learn about artificial colouring and flavouring, chemical preservatives and understand food labelling. Finally,armed with a knowledge of food science, young people see the value of healthy eating
habits , and learn which foods are detrimental to health. By then cooking food themselves, they practice safe hygiene standards and gain the lifelong skill of preparing nutritious home-made food.
In conclusion, although the school curriculum is crowded, I agree with the opinion that space must be found to teach food science and preparation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | claraa_ltn | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Miaa | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the amount of time children spend with their parents depending on age groups 67
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 70
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a salmon
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 89
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should s
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , armed
...s and understand food labelling. Finally,armed with a knowledge of food science, young...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g people see the value of healthy eating habits , and learn which foods are detri...
^^^
Line 6, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...see the value of healthy eating habits , and learn which foods are detrimental t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16262975779 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84501775749 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6893290922 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249748288359 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768244098837 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784912492133 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13115000001 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11049637029 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.