The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012

The two maps illustrate the transformation of a humble size theater over a 2-years period from 2010.
From a general perspective, i could be seen that the theater underwent dramatic modification in new forms. While several infrastructures remained unchanged, the others were expanded, replaced, or added.
First, the initial structure which stayed in the same location was the stage, which was not only still located in close proximity to the middle top of the theater but also expanded. Another one is the auditorium, this area was allocated at the center and totally unchanged over time.
Second, when we looking along the bottom of these maps, there were significantly modified. The cafe’s booth was converted with a ticket office in the right-hand corner and the main entrain was moved a little to the right too to suit the convenience of the customers. Moreover, the restaurants were set up to the southeast of the theater for hunger demands and it lead to the result that the admin office was relocated to the north a bit on the left side. Furthermore, the media initial at the top of the map was replaced with a hall and it was rebuilt at the left side of the stage. Also that, the showers were built under the media for some personal reasons. The last one, storage was switched from the left of the theaters to the right with a new area

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...from 2010. From a general perspective, i could be seen that the theater underwen...
^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...ge, which was not only still located in close proximity to the middle top of the theater but al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...f the theater for hunger demands and it lead to the result that the admin office was...
^^^^
Line 4, column 584, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... rebuilt at the left side of the stage. Also that, the showers were built under the ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75319148936 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66375501221 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591489361702 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8933698061 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.545454545 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0702247962664 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295395464067 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384190377056 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573247393981 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390444904509 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.