how do you find about the party
Dear Ms. Michelle Lang
Thank you for sending me your letter. I have just received it yesterday and currently, I am extremely excited to write to you to tell you about my experiences, feelings and maybe something that I want to improve a bit. I have to admit that attending parties is my perennial favourite, your one was lovely. The vibe was great, I love the way you celebrate it in your private garden. After some drinks, we can really get into some conversations about our burdens at the workplace, or personal plans about some therapeutic recreational activities. I have to say that I accidentally encountered your post about this private party on Facebook,then I immediately signed up with the hope of getting away from the hustle and bustle of city life. Actually, you have done quite a wonderful job. Your food was delicious, they really made my mouth water. My favourite dish was chicken barbecue, it was relatively tender, juicy, and the dipping sauce was phenomenal. Because it was held in your private garden, I really stood a good chance of meeting your family members, they were fantastic, I mean that they were warm, welcomed, friendly and hostile. I adore the way they interact with me and other guests. Your service was good, in some aspects. However, I am a bit worried about the final steps when the party is over. You discharged all the waste with a huge black plastic bag and in my opinion, you could really do a better job by just simply selecting and separating them into two categories which is organic and non-organic rubbish. Another thing to develop is trying not to abuse disposable containers, like paper cups. That is that, I hope my suggestion can give you a hint to improve your service next time.
I am looking forward to joining another party of yours.
Your faithfully.
Nguyen Tien Dat
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | arami | view | |
| 2021-11-19 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | thanhthao.1999 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-07 | adish123 | view |
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population country should make use of genetically engineered foods However some people believe that GM foods are not only unhealthy but affect the nature too Do you agree or disagree about this 78
- The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 17
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...ost about this private party on Facebook,then I immediately signed up with the hope o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, look, may, really, so, then, another thing, i mean, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 32.9175257732 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 937.175257732 161% => OK
No of words: 317.0 206.0 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7665615142 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67936461047 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 127.690721649 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608832807571 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 290.88556701 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 24.0 9.13402061856 263% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6804123711 142% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4255454042 44.8134815571 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9444444444 76.5299724578 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 16.8248392259 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 4.34317383033 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 7.41237113402 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193206164854 0.216113520407 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542203987595 0.0766984524023 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518894321481 0.0603063233224 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915030225053 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776926573827 0.0580467560999 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 8.37731958763 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 8.71597938144 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 41.2886597938 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.