The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now.
The given maps illustrate the changes of a school library between 5 years ago and now.
As can be seen from the maps, the school library has undergone various transformations. There has been the introduction of new facilities in place of the old one.
To the southwest corner of the map now lies 4 rooms instead of 3 rooms 5 years ago. While the recording room has been constructed as the replacement for the classroom, the borrowing and returning desks in the past has been separated into 2 different sections.
There used to be a library office in the southeast corner of the library, but people has converted it into a conference room. The desk for computers to the north of it has been transformed to desk for student’s laptops.
In the center of the map, book shelves as well as studying tables remains unchanged, however, there has been more tables for studying.
- Some people believe that the government should make laws regarding nutrition and healthy lifestyle while others think that it is a matter of personal responsibility Discuss both the views and give your opinion 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 30
- The charts below show the percentages of readers who preferred to read certain types of book at A Z library in 2009 71
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 726.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82148618882 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2604149849 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21326577839 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10514914951 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136118130981 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139711000721 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144734145032 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.