The plans below show a science park in 2008 and the same science park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans below show a science park in 2008 and the same science park today. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pictures give information about a science park in 2008 and the same park today.
Overall, the science park has undergone significant modifications with the addition of new infrastructures for education and alteration in road system, making it more accessible and space-effective.
In 2008, there was a grassland in the northwestern side of the park which has been demolished to make room for a block of research and development. Adjacent to it, a couple of blocks including offices and reception have witnessed a removal of reception to erect a new university hub, while the grassland has remained intact. South of these new things, business units are unchanged and car park and cyber security blocks have witnessed alteration with the reduction in size for the former and transformation to L-shaped structure for the latter.
Moving to the south of the park, the circular IT centre nearby the grassland has been converted into an innovation centre. There is a new station on the railway below the aforementioned facility with a more walking way that is connected to various facilities. At present, a biking path has been installed parallel to the internal road and a bus stop has been constructed at the end on the eastern side of the park.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2025-01-11 nobitaa 78 view
2024-09-09 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-09-09 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-07-29 nobitaa 67 view
2024-06-07 nobitaa 73 view
Essays by user nobitaa :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04326923077 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05321015829 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.142168757 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213752221345 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104890400327 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121615456974 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172526136959 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137476962617 0.0819641961636 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.