The diagram featured above details the steps by which pu’erh raw and ripened tea are produced.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there are 3 main stages beginning with initial deactivation and drying, followed by either aging or fermentation and finally storage in the case of the raw tea and compression for the ripe tea.
The process for both varieties of tea commences when the leaves are fried in pans in order to deactivate specific enzymes. This is followed by rolling of the fried leaves and drying in the sun. In the next stage, the two kinds of tea are treated in different ways.
For the ripe tea, the loose raw tea is fermented with mold and then compressed to form the final product. In terms of the raw tea, the leaves are first compressed. Subsequent to this step, the tea is aged, rather than fermented, and the pu’erh raw tea is then available for use.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 61
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 61
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: After
...w tea, the leaves are first compressed. Subsequent to this step, the tea is aged, rather than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6875 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51616647899 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4658515452 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430227723594 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198078798742 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963645667464 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25206071389 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968923311264 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.