The provided charts make comparisons among various types of energy generation in France between 1995 and 2005. In general, the percentage of fossil fuels production always dominated in both years, with coal being the largest while nuclear and other kinds of sources witnessed the minority during a decade. In terms of fossil fuels, coal creation experienced a slight increase from 29,80% in 1995 to nearly a third in 2005, and this is followed by the production of gas growing modestly from 29,63% to 30,31%. Conversely, the figure that of petro energy, which was the only source of energy indicated a decrease trend, dropped approximately 10% ( 29,27%- 19,55%). The production of nuclear power and other energy, on the other hand, indicated a similar pattern climbing gently from 3,40% to 10,10% and from 4,90% to 9,10% respectively. In addition, the proportion of energy from other sources generated the smallest amount of energy over the 10-year period.
The provided charts make comparisons among various types of energy generation in France between 1995 and 2005.
In general, the percentage of fossil fuels production always dominated in both years, with coal being the largest while nuclear and other kinds of sources witnessed the minority during a decade.
In terms of fossil fuels, coal creation experienced a slight increase from 29,80% in 1995 to nearly a third in 2005, and this is followed by the production of gas growing modestly from 29,63% to 30,31%. Conversely, the figure that of petro energy, which was the only source of energy indicated a decrease trend, dropped approximately 10% ( 29,27%- 19,55%).
The production of nuclear power and other energy, on the other hand, indicated a similar pattern climbing gently from 3,40% to 10,10% and from 4,90% to 9,10% respectively. In addition, the proportion of energy from other sources generated the smallest amount of energy over the 10-year period.
The provided charts make comparisons among various types of energy generation in France between 1995 and 2005.
In general, the percentage of fossil fuels production always dominated in both years, with coal being the largest while nuclear and other kinds of sources witnessed the minority during a decade. In terms of fossil fuels, coal creation experienced a slight increase from 29,80% in 1995 to nearly a third in 2005, and this is followed by the production of gas growing modestly from 29,63% to 30,31%. Conversely, the figure that of petro energy, which was the only source of energy indicated a decrease trend, dropped approximately 10% ( 29,27%- 19,55%).
The production of nuclear power and other energy, on the other hand, indicated a similar pattern climbing gently from 3,40% to 10,10% and from 4,90% to 9,10% respectively. In addition, the proportion of energy from other sources generated the smallest amount of energy over the 10-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-07 | zhangfei123 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | zhangfei123 | view |
- The table illustrates the changes in the amount of money spent on an average Australian household each month between 1991 and 2001 In general the total expenditure per month spent in 2001 was higher than that of the household consumed in 1991 Additionally
- The table illustrates the changes in the amount of money spent on an average Australian household each month between 1991 and 2001 In general the total expenditure per month spent in 2001 was higher than that of the household consumed in 1991 Additionally 11
- The provided charts make comparisons among various types of energy generation in France between 1995 and 2005 In general the percentage of fossil fuels production always dominated in both years with coal being the largest while nuclear and other kinds of
- The provided charts make comparisons among various types of energy generation in France between 1995 and 2005 In general the percentage of fossil fuels production always dominated in both years with coal being the largest while nuclear and other kinds of 67
- The provided charts make comparisons among various types of energy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecrease trend, dropped approximately 10% 29,27%- 19,55%. The production of nucl...
^^
Line 7, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecrease trend, dropped approximately 10% 29,27%- 19,55%. The production of nucl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, third, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 33.7804878049 195% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 965.302439024 167% => OK
No of words: 308.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24025974026 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61880790288 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.318181818182 0.547539520022 58% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 283.868780488 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4548819311 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438974969779 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218112279891 0.103423049105 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198604792401 0.0843802449381 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305265735362 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185145961645 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.