In few countries, it is a common practice to educate children that any goal can be
achieved through toil and labor. Although, there are definitely facts undermining this issue,
I still think it is a useful practice for yielding resilient generations.
Most common argument against this act is that hard work usually do not constitute
the whole picture. Instead, income of the parents, race and sex of the individual, societal
and political conditions they live in and many other factors can be evident contributors to
one’s success. For example, although popular wealthy people such as Elon Musk, Jeff
Bezos and Bill Gates are hailed as self-made billionaires, all of them had robust financial
backing from either their parents, or inherited assets, making risky business decisions
much less perilous.
On the other hand, it is important to consider the motivational factor this
encouragement has for the younger generation. In the rapidly advancing and competitive
economy and job market one has to improve their skills and faculties uncessantly, which is
exactly what the saying advises. Personally, in my younger years belief of meritocracy
instilled in me by my parents and educators was a major reason propelling me forward.
And although now I am much more familiar with the less positive realities of life, still
relatively high chance of being rewarded for my hard work is a motivating factor in my
education.
Overall, despite many criticisms against it, I believe instilling children with the belief
that they can accomplish any task is overall a positive endorsement and will be beneficial
through their lives.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, as for, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87305375338 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 106.607317073 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665384615385 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3987603147 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 3.83414634146 469% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127573333022 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485373700745 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426628260637 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0345932298402 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402742296012 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 40.7170731707 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, as for, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38461538462 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87305375338 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 106.607317073 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665384615385 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3987603147 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 3.83414634146 469% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127573333022 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485373700745 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426628260637 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0345932298402 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402742296012 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 40.7170731707 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.