Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spent solving immediate problems here on Earth.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
In the current era, space exploration is one of the highly sought scientific experiment. Space exploration requires huge amount of funds and resources, which lead to criticism by many, on the account that such funds could be used for solving immediate problems on earth. It is believed that space exploration is the necessary evil as it help expand human knowledge and will benefit humanity in future. Space exploration will help solve the problem of rising population and depletion of natural resources on the earth.
Firstly, space exploration can help with rising population on earth. For instance, space exploration can lead to finding of another habitable planet. Thus, solving the earth population problem as people can be relocated to the new planet. Therefore, one of the main reason space exploration should be continued.
A second reason is that space exploration can help with the depleting natural resources on the earth. For example, it can lead to discovery of planetary bodies rich in mineral, water, etc. It is obvious from the example that harvesting of mineral and water from such bodies would benefit the earth population. Thus, it can be concluded that space exploration is beneficial to humanity in future.
In conclusion, space exploration will help solve rising population and scarcity of natural resources on the earth. Thus, space exploration is necessary and will help the humanity and the earth in the long run. It is recommended that space exploration should take the front seat as it will help solve future problems.
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems so who do u think should be responsible for solving it Is it the governments organization or each individual 64
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 73
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters Do u support it or not Agree Disagree 81
- People should stop giving to charities because they don’t know where their money ends up 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...exploration is the necessary evil as it help expand human knowledge and will benefit...
^^^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...man knowledge and will benefit humanity in future. Space exploration will help solve the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e exploration is beneficial to humanity in future. In conclusion, space exploration wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 1.00243902439 1496% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.97073170732 504% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77532268394 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3492636505 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354338038429 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153811942287 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103402045146 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242445075631 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684453061673 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.