Some people thinks that accepting bad situations is the best way, while others have opinion that trying and improving bad situations are better. I partly agree with both opinions, since each view has its own good side to me.
When facing bad situations such as being unsatisfied with job and lacking of money, we have to accept it. This means, that we should think positively about those situation. For the example, if I didn't work here, i would not learn to adapt with work environment like this. So, i concur that every bad situations has beneficial thing that can be absorbed for the development of ourselves, and there God has good intention and great plan for us behind those obstacles.
Besides that, accepting and thinking positively are not enough to us. Because, by only accepting and not introspecting ourselves, we would not try to increase our abilities. For the example, by only surrendering to the situation where our jobs are dissatisfying, we won't try to improve our skills that will make us able to get out from those situations. But, if we attempt to add more skills and abilities that needed by the new workplace, we will finally be able to get a better job.
So, in conclusion, although people may have different opinions, I concur that I only partly agree to both opinions. Because, each of those perspectives has the good thing that can be learnt to establish a better us.
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
- The Bar chart shows the top ten countries for production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by select the main features and make comparisons when relevant 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'those situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; those situations
..., that we should think positively about those situation. For the example, if I didnt work here,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... those situation. For the example, if I didnt work here, i would not learn to adapt w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... For the example, if I didnt work here, i would not learn to adapt with work envi...
^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...pt with work environment like this. So, i concur that every bad situations has be...
^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t I only partly agree to both opinions. Because, each of those perspectives has the goo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 5.60731707317 713% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80165289256 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69152631661 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566115702479 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5659608117 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204177773115 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739230455011 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773861172034 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131242908502 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904268348933 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.